[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

[bryant]

Many, many, many, many, many people have expressed their displeasure with the rules of Quidditch. “Bah,” I have always said to myself. “Games don’t always make sense. Games evolve. The other players are important if the golden snitch isn’t caught.”

After having learned about Eton’s The Wall Game, which has been played at Eton for over three hundred years, I no longer feel any need to defend the existence of strange and nonsensical British schoolboy games. The Wall Game even has a method of scoring points which essentially ends the game in one fell swoop: scoring a goal is worth ten points, as opposed to the more common shys (worth one point), and games are generally scoreless ties anyhow. So if you score a goal, you’re going to win.

And the method of scoring goals is not symmetric between the teams. So quit picking on Qudditch.

Comments

[robotnik.livejournal.com]

I kinda figured Quidditch had to be based on some demented thing like that.

So why isn't this a 20x20 Room post? It's about gaming.

[tayefeth.livejournal.com]

Nah, Quidditch is closer to being based on cricket. After all, The Wall Game only lasts half an hour.