Iowa Predictions
Jan. 4th, 2008 11:01 amHuckabee probably rides this to a decent third place showing in New Hampshire. Romney needs to win New Hampshire, but I don't think he will. I think McCain takes it, Romney comes in second and is increasingly marginalized, and the remainder of the primary process is the fight between McCain and Huckabee. I'm biased here because I think that would be a completely amusing race.
Edwards is in trouble. A strong second place showing would have been very good; a close race with Clinton for second place is not so good. He needs to come in second in New Hampshire, preferably by a big margin, and Clinton needs to come in third again. But I sort of think it'll be Obama first, Clinton second, Edwards third, and that sets the stage for Obama to win out.
I reserve the right to repredict on Monday.
Addendum:
This is a picture of why Edwards is in trouble. Third in union households, did poorly among self-identified liberals -- the guy came in second thanks to self-identified conservatives and wealthier voters. Which is weird, because that's not the campaign he's running, but for whatever reason his populist message isn't getting over.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 04:58 pm (UTC)Not weird. He's the white guy.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:01 pm (UTC)I'm also really interested by the way the "Romney is a phony" meme/talking point is gaining traction with commentators across the political spectrum. It's clearly being pumped by his opponents, and the news media likes it because it lets them seem probing and confrontational without doing any real work. Now, I happen to believe the sentiment is true, I don't think Romney has a genuine political or moral conviction in his entire body, but it's still fascinating to watch unfold mechanically.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:15 pm (UTC)http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#val=IAREP
Huckabee much?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:22 pm (UTC)The bigger surprise, I think, is Ron Paul actually picking up 2 delegates.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:35 pm (UTC)There's the split in the GOP right there between the theocons and the neocons. It'll be interesting to see who comes out on top in this war for the party's soul...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:48 pm (UTC)If Obama pulls through and gets the nomination, the Republicans are going to be in a bind. There is no one as exciting as Obama on the Republican side. And while I would like McCain to grab the bid (and actually make it feel like I have a real choice for once), that's not going to happen. I think a Romney nomination win will drive the theocons to a third party candidate or to sit out. A Huckabee nomination keeps the theocons but loses the moderate to left Republicans to Obama (or possibly Edwards but certainly not Clinton). McCain has the only real chance to keep both theocons and neocons in the party, but I don't think he's going to get the nod, sadly.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 05:57 pm (UTC)Also, i wonder just how well Huckabee will do outside of Jesusland. And i'm absolutely tickled that Giuliani finished behind Ron Paul.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-04 06:07 pm (UTC)The trial lawyer background may be why the populist message isn't sticking. Note that I'm not saying I think Edwards is a populist; I just think he's running as one. Or it may be that the haircut smears are an effective blocker. Or something else entirely.