Date: 2003-03-07 09:39 am (UTC)
bryant: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bryant
Well, three; can't forget Pakistan's loony potential.

I think that's the right line to take in examining the question, but I am not convinced that it provides a full and sufficient answer. Here's why.

a) It seems likely that Pakistan helped North Korea out with its nuclear weapons program.

b) North Korea is gearing up to crank out around one bomb a month.

That makes two unstable regimes with significant nuclear programs, one of which has demonstrated willingness to aid in proliferation.

c) Bush's case against Iraqi WMD is largely predicated on the concept that he will sell them to terrorists.

If WMD are /already/ available to terrorists, it doesn't really matter how many players there are in that game. The threshold for disaster is very low.

d) Bush also argues that Saddam has designs on his neighbors.

No doubt true but note that containment has been effective there for over a decade now; note also that Saddam's previous pair of wars (Kuwait and Iran) were, as far as he knew, OK with the US. It's been a long long time since Iraq attacked a neighboring country without first believing it was acceptable to us.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 10:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios