[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

[bryant]

Heh. I was right last night; the troops are pushing towards Baghdad. It’s been a successful advance so far. Note the destruction of the dam in that last story; that was a definite coup, since there’s been some worry that Saddam would be able to flood the river valley and slow down advancing troops.

This is another point at which Saddam is likely to use chemical weapons if he has ‘em. Up till now there’s been no new convincing evidence that he does, but one of the BBC embeds filed a report that his troops found instructions to an Iraqi Chemical Warfare Officer. (John Simpson, at 11:11 GMT.) Not hard evidence, just the most relevant thing we’ve found so far. I don’t count the chem warfare suits, no. We have a bunch of those too.

Comments

[space-parasite.livejournal.com]

I don't count the chem warfare suits, no. We have a bunch of
those too.

But er don't we also have weapons that require our troops to use their spiffy NBC suits? Not that this is proof one way or the other, but I think it makes your second sentence less effective.

[bryant]

Yeah, but not in Iraq -- we don't plan on using 'em, in theory.

[jeregenest.livejournal.com]

According to international treaty (I know the Bushites hate that word) any nation has the right to research and develop deense measures.

Plus the suits they found can be ordered by most any biopharm in the world. I got three.

Jere