[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

[bryant]

About Cheaper by the Dozen: Roger Ebert is wrong, and pretty clearly wasn’t paying close attention to the movie anyhow, since he has a couple of factual errors in his review. So, no, it’s not a three star movie. 1.5 stars, maybe. Not funny, not charming, kind of depressing. Me, I like my cheerful uplifting Christmas movies to be about success rather than failure.

Comments

[rollick.livejournal.com]

Every time I bother to read Roger Ebert, I notice factual errors in his reviews. And this has been going on for a decade at least. Drives me nuts, and makes me wonder why the hell someone isn't fact-checking him, and/or why there hasn't been a public outcry for him to get his stories straight.

[bryant]

Ah, then it's not just me. Usually I don't care /so/ much, but this time he appears to have simply read the press kit or something.