I'm not clicking on any links in LiveJournal entries until they fix the security hole. Recommend you don't either. Long story short, it's immensely easy to set up a page which, when you view it, will post something to your journal. That something can include a link to a page which, when you view it -- well, you get the idea.
I don't see any password theft vulnerabilities but I haven't really put too much effort into thinking about it, so I could be wrong.
I also have no idea how this gets fixed.
Sigh.
I don't see any password theft vulnerabilities but I haven't really put too much effort into thinking about it, so I could be wrong.
I also have no idea how this gets fixed.
Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:47 pm (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/community/lj_dev/641972.html
I'm going to post and urge bradfitz to not worry about the poorly implemented clients which may suffer as a result of implementing the fix.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 04:36 pm (UTC)Well, presumably, if it knew someone else's password, it could log you in as them, and make your computer post on their journal, or possibly delete it.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 04:43 pm (UTC)At any rate, yeah, the random auth key is a good solution, although it would be nice if they made it so you could have more than one key checked out at once - I often have 3 or 4 "post a comment" tabs open at the same time.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-13 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 08:15 pm (UTC)