[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar
Sep. 9th, 2004 10:11 pmYou know what? This document was not created in 1973. Maybe it's a transcription, but that's Times New Roman, and those are curly apostrophes, and there's just no way. Also, it's a lousy CYA memo, since it's just claims with no backing evidence.
CBS needs to provide an evidence trail for those memos, or give up on their authenticity.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 09:00 pm (UTC)Also reminds me of John Sasso and the Biden/Kinnock tape.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-11 10:00 am (UTC)So my current theory: if it's a forgery, the most likely source is someone involved at the time who recently typed up fake memos to validate his story. It would explain the most mysterious aspect of this so far: the White House hasn't denied anything, not even Bush disobeying a direct order. Instead they spun it as 'he was working with his superiors to solve the problem.' That's just *odd*, if they are complete fakes. Surely Bush would remember that he didn't do that. It would explain why the general thought they sounded authentic; the facts and sentiments expressed were what the forger really heard or saw.
It's so hard to see any external person spending enough time with Bush's other, validated records to get things like title and PO Boxes right, seeing all those monospace ancient fonts, not once thinking 'hey! I should get a typewriter, or at least a typewriter font!' While someone who was there at the time might have done it from memory, and being an amateur being sloppy enough to just use Word.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-11 10:45 am (UTC)