bryant: (Default)
[personal profile] bryant

Other than that the showrunner is a geek’s geek, who has credits in RPGs, comics, and of course television in the last year, how did I like the show?

… that was way too overworked a sentence for the sake of a couple of cheap jokes. I want to put semi-colons in it, but I can’t figure out where.

Anyway, how’s Leverage? Well, it’s not great television so far. Five episodes in, and I can’t say I have a strong emotional attachment to any of the characters. I say so far because I think the potential exists — Timothy Hutton’s a solid actor and there’s backstory to be developed there, and I’ve seen Gina Bellman dig out emotional grounding from a character who’s way more superficial than Sophie. So I think there’s potential. But it’s also the case that the characters are currently collections of quirks; in the introductory sequences, we saw what they could do rather than who they were.

Which is OK! I mean, there’s a hacker and a combat specialist and a cat burglar and an actor and a plotter, which is cool. It’s not great television, but it is great fun, and I gotta say everyone’s clearly relishing their characters. Plus the con jobs are marvelous. Rogers is doing a great job with the narrative conceits, and the mini-flashbacks to reveal how a con worked are perfect. You get a nice juicy heist every week. I also like the structure a lot: the first con always breaks down, and Nate always has to think on his feet to get out on top.

We’re also getting some subtle, which is one of the other reasons I said “so far” above. There was a nice bit in “The Bank Job,” the most recent episode, where the wrong two characters are forced to pretend to be FBI agents. They’re really bad at it. For the first five seconds, I was all “oh god that’s bad acting, this is terrible,” until I realized “wait, that’s awesome acting, it’s the characters who can’t pull that off.” So I appreciated that. There is somewhat of a roleplaying game sensibility to this sucker, as S. pointed out in reference to the characters, and which also shows itself in the zeal with which the characters get put into bad situations.

Disgression begins:

Christian Kane looked familiar for a while to me; the other night, I was watching old Angel episodes. Right! He’s Lindsey from Wolfram & Hart, the mostly evil lawyer. But it does not end there, because you know who else shows up as a Wolfram & Hart lawyer? Daniel Dae Kim, who is probably better known for playing a supreme badass on Lost. It’s almost as if actors wind up appearing on multiple shows during the course of their careers.

Leverage is on my Tivo and it’s likely to stay there. Recommended.

Originally published at Imaginary Vestibule.

Date: 2009-01-05 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiffer.livejournal.com
I'm enjoying Leverage immensly. It's desinitely not Thw Wire (and it doesn't try to be), but I think it's the most fun show on TV right now.

Date: 2009-01-05 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] editswlonghair.livejournal.com
Thanks for that link to his blog. I had no idea the network was pulling a 'Firefly' on him, and showing the eps. out of order... but now that I know that, I can kind of see it now that I think back on it. The crew we're really gelled and chummy in earlier episodes, and then backslid a bit in later ones. Hopefully they'll put them in the proper order on the DVD.

And I had no idea he had rpg and comic credits too. Cool. I had some hopes for the show since Dean Devlin is also involved as a producer and director, and his 'Librarian' movies are always good, pulpy fun.

Anyways, yeah... I'm eating 'Leverage' up with a spoon. I <3 this show.

So, how did you like 'Hot Rock'?

Date: 2009-01-05 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] head58.livejournal.com
You've been pimping Leverage on me, but neglected to mention John Rogers' involment? You are so fired.

Date: 2009-01-05 06:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] editswlonghair.livejournal.com
I had never heard of him before. Now I'm intrigued.

Date: 2009-01-05 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] editswlonghair.livejournal.com
No, I haven't been... but now that you've pointed out that blog, I'm going to go back thru it when I have more time!

Date: 2009-01-05 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
"leverage" is absolutely my favorite popcorn on the tivo right now. it's just plain *fun*.

Date: 2009-01-05 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telepresence.livejournal.com
I'm liking-ish Leverage. I posted about the pilot a ways back and having seen a few more episodes, it still somehow feels dated to me. Like a good quality syndicated show from the 90s. And as you say, the characters are more containers for their schticks so far than people, although they become more personlike when paired off and interacting separately (especially conwoman/Tim Hutton and Muscle/Hacker guy).

For an ongoing caper series I worry a bit about smug fatigue, where I start actually hoping they fail for once.

Date: 2009-01-05 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tahnan.livejournal.com
I'm totally enjoying the show, but it'd take a lot for me to not enjoy a con story. The characters may be mostly quirkiness, but the writing's enough fun that I don't care. ("Horses are not the psychopathic killers I thought." And the line about torrenting Doctor Who!)

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 12:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios