[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

Sep. 17th, 2003 06:13 pm
bryant: (Default)
[personal profile] bryant

Partial credit for this one.

“There’s no question that Saddam Hussein had al-Qaida ties…. We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the Sept. 11 attacks.”
— George Bush

Well, 50% accuracy on those particular facts is a step up for him. But what’s that imply about his determination to go after Iraq as soon as possible post-9/11? And isn’t it clear that Pakistan had much stronger Al Qaeda ties? So why Iraq first?

Date: 2003-09-17 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carneggy.livejournal.com
Well, Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and Iraq doesn't..

Date: 2003-09-18 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwenix.livejournal.com
You know, we trained Osama bin Laden. Wouldn't that show a very provable link according to the Bush Administration?

*ahem*

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 11:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios