[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

Sep. 28th, 2003 09:23 am
bryant: (Default)
[personal profile] bryant

Half of me wonders if Mark Millar’s latest column isn’t a prank. But — Orson Wells as Batman? In 1946?

Millar mentions a Lionel Hutton as the source of the news, and there’s no trace of any Lionel Hutton on the Web. I’m thinking the column is a prank. But, hey; it’s a glorious concept, and I’ll dream of Dietrich as Catwoman tonight. (And Cagney as the Riddler. Yum.)

Date: 2003-09-28 06:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mgrasso.livejournal.com
Yeah, it's been debunked pretty thoroughly (Riddler didn't appear until 1948, apparently), but my God, what a cool idea. It'd make a great graphic novel in and of itself. I've never read any of the very early 30s and 40s Detective Comics, but all the indications are that Batman at the time would have made a great period noir thriller.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 07:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios