[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar
Nov. 6th, 2003 10:11 pmWow, those are certainly some attractive jobless numbers there. In fact, they’re so good I stole the graphic so I could stick it up here.

Damn, but that’s good. So good, I decided to reformat it a bit so I could admire it again.

Oh. And I guess employment dropped by 41,000 anyhow. So, uh… what’s unemployment look like, anyhow?

As they say, all this really means is that the rate of increase has decreased.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-06 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-06 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-06 07:22 pm (UTC)And the jobless claims only tell half the story there. It's job loss vs. job creation, and I don't *feel* like there's a lot of that.
Wow
Date: 2003-11-06 10:00 pm (UTC)As someone who majored in Economic theory in college (and who is now in business school), I habitually keep an eye on the economy... and all of the (sane) analysts that I have read seem to be saying that while the economy *is* improving (we are *technically* out of the recession) that the (hopefully) eventual fall in the unemployment rate will likely lag behind by around a year or so. So, about this time next year, from what I've been reading, is when we should start to see unemployment start to drop back down.
That's what I have been reading, at least. My gut feeling on the numbers I have been looking at over the past year or so make me want to agree with that. (which is why I decided to go back to school and get an MBA, the job market should have stabilized and probably improved bu the time I graduate ::crosses fingers::)
Nice catch on that first graph, I am still amused by the audacity of the attempted deception.
-peterB
Tufte! Tufte! Tufte!
Date: 2003-11-07 08:53 am (UTC)Envisioning Information
Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative
no subject
Date: 2003-11-13 09:24 pm (UTC)