[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

[bryant]

About Cheaper by the Dozen: Roger Ebert is wrong, and pretty clearly wasn’t paying close attention to the movie anyhow, since he has a couple of factual errors in his review. So, no, it’s not a three star movie. 1.5 stars, maybe. Not funny, not charming, kind of depressing. Me, I like my cheerful uplifting Christmas movies to be about success rather than failure.

Comments

[ronebofh.livejournal.com]

Well, as far as movies are concerned, RT seems to get a fair amount of critics, and the good/bad dichotomy evens out over that quantity. I'm not sure how having the blurbs in order makes any difference.

The wide variety of media they cover is a big win, though.

[rollick.livejournal.com]

Mostly, attaching a numeric rating to a review and then presenting them in order makes it easier to pick out a strongly positive review or a strongly negative one, or to deliberately locate one that's just about balanced. Rottentomatoes' thumbs-up/thumbs-down philosophy kind of makes every review into a crap shoot. Just because they type a review as negative, for instance, doesn't mean there's no praise whatsoever in the film. I like metacritic because I can see where all the reviewers fell along the scale from good to bad, and the orderly presentation just makes it simpler to find things.