[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

Dec. 27th, 2003 08:59 am
bryant: (Default)
[personal profile] bryant

About Cheaper by the Dozen: Roger Ebert is wrong, and pretty clearly wasn’t paying close attention to the movie anyhow, since he has a couple of factual errors in his review. So, no, it’s not a three star movie. 1.5 stars, maybe. Not funny, not charming, kind of depressing. Me, I like my cheerful uplifting Christmas movies to be about success rather than failure.

Date: 2003-12-28 06:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com
Mostly, attaching a numeric rating to a review and then presenting them in order makes it easier to pick out a strongly positive review or a strongly negative one, or to deliberately locate one that's just about balanced. Rottentomatoes' thumbs-up/thumbs-down philosophy kind of makes every review into a crap shoot. Just because they type a review as negative, for instance, doesn't mean there's no praise whatsoever in the film. I like metacritic because I can see where all the reviewers fell along the scale from good to bad, and the orderly presentation just makes it simpler to find things.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 12:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios