[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar
Apr. 22nd, 2005 03:27 pmWeird idea, while drifting off to sleep:
A Lexicon of Lost Hollywood. Each entry is a movie review of a movie that was never made; each movie review must refer forward and back to other movies. You can make up actors and directors and screenwriters if you like, but they cannot be entries: they will always be defined only by the reviews of their movies. Or, if you wish, you can use the stars that we know.
The slots are not alphabetical: they are chronological. 1940-1945; 1945-1950; 1950-1955; 1955-1960; 1960-1965; 1965-1970; 1970-1975; 1975-1980; 1980-1985; 1985-1990; 1990-1995; 1995-2000. 12 slots. The secret history of Hollywood (and Bollywood, and the BBC, and Hong Kong) is revealed slowly as the needle of time moves forward.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 11:58 pm (UTC)Having sent it back, I don't have it to look at, and it's not clear to me from skimming the page. I would assume so, because I don't think there are a bunch of series of early film shorts running around.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 12:01 am (UTC)The DVD has been such a gift to film historians it's amazing.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 12:41 pm (UTC)Yeah, I'm going to have to participate in this lexicon if I have time.
Oh, and if you are a gamer who is also into silents, let me point you in the direction of a 24-hour rpg I did last month: 'Lights! Camera! ACTION!' I still haven't had a chance to actually run a playtest witha group, and I've thought of changes and revisions I'd like to make, but I'd love to get feedback!
http://homepage.mac.com/editswithlonghair/FileSharing15.html
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 12:55 pm (UTC)And if I can get those revisions done in the near future, I will send you the updated rules.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-24 02:53 pm (UTC)