[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

Jan. 9th, 2004 07:55 pm
bryant: (Default)
[personal profile] bryant

Pete Rose is still gambling. What kind of idiot would let him back into baseball now?

Date: 2004-01-11 09:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skylion.livejournal.com
Really, your last arguement depends on how much you care about professional sports. I have watched, over the past decade, my city spend in inordinate amount of time and money, energies that could have really improved my community on two sports complexes. That the teams, the Reds, and the Bengals, are less than average teams is a trivial debate to me.
It's all trivial to me really. And quite absurd that people that play leisurly games make more money than a teacher. So with that in mind, I don't really care anymore. They can shoot each other in the head with loaded rifles to win a game ;-) We got big buisness pushing people out of thier homes in my city. Pete Rose and gambling. It just doesn't compare.

Date: 2004-01-11 12:06 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (quiet)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
It's not any more absurd that people get paid millions for a leisurely game than it is for people to get paid millions for performing a play. When you do something well enough to be entertainment for millions of people, the money doesn't seem so absurd anymore.

It might seem trivial, but it can be a worthwhile investment for the city to promote sports because it brings in more revenue (i'd lean towards it not being so, but the potential is there). But i agree that sports should be low on the city's priority list (bread and circuses, anyone?).

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 14th, 2026 06:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios