[Population: One] <A HREF="http://popone.innocence.com/ar

Dec. 27th, 2003 08:59 am
bryant: (Default)
[personal profile] bryant

About Cheaper by the Dozen: Roger Ebert is wrong, and pretty clearly wasn’t paying close attention to the movie anyhow, since he has a couple of factual errors in his review. So, no, it’s not a three star movie. 1.5 stars, maybe. Not funny, not charming, kind of depressing. Me, I like my cheerful uplifting Christmas movies to be about success rather than failure.

Date: 2003-12-27 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] multiplexer.livejournal.com
Bryant, you want to use http://www.rottentomatoes.com. Roger Ebert liked it, but so many other people didn't I knew to stay well away.

Date: 2003-12-27 11:31 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (evil)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
I vote FOR Rotten Tomatoes.

Date: 2003-12-27 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com
I vote against, since this is apparently a democracy. metacritic.com does the exact same thing, but includes more critics (as I know from personal experience), is better organized (the blurb/links are given in order from highest rating to lowest, instead of just splattered all over the page) and provides more information (they judge each review and give it a numerical rating, instead of going with rottentomatoes' good/bad dichotomy). Also, they cover more media.

Date: 2003-12-27 05:07 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (quiet)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Well, as far as movies are concerned, RT seems to get a fair amount of critics, and the good/bad dichotomy evens out over that quantity. I'm not sure how having the blurbs in order makes any difference.

The wide variety of media they cover is a big win, though.

Date: 2003-12-28 06:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com
Mostly, attaching a numeric rating to a review and then presenting them in order makes it easier to pick out a strongly positive review or a strongly negative one, or to deliberately locate one that's just about balanced. Rottentomatoes' thumbs-up/thumbs-down philosophy kind of makes every review into a crap shoot. Just because they type a review as negative, for instance, doesn't mean there's no praise whatsoever in the film. I like metacritic because I can see where all the reviewers fell along the scale from good to bad, and the orderly presentation just makes it simpler to find things.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 12:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios